<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ryan&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rmauger.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rmauger.co.uk</link>
	<description>Randomness will get you everywhere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:24:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zend Framework, Zend_Dojo and  Dojo Tree by tree of life celtic</title>
		<link>http://www.rmauger.co.uk/2009/02/zend-framework-zend_dojo-and-dojo-tree/comment-page-1/#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator>tree of life celtic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmauger.co.uk/?p=18#comment-995</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Just Browsing...&lt;/strong&gt;

Then I came across this blog when surfing around on the internet earlier this week...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Just Browsing&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Then I came across this blog when surfing around on the internet earlier this week&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Twig with Zend Framework by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.rmauger.co.uk/2011/05/using-twig-with-zend-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-991</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmauger.co.uk/?p=177#comment-991</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, but when you make it look like seo spam, it ruins the sincerity of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, but when you make it look like seo spam, it ruins the sincerity of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Keeping your HTML valid with Zend Framework, Tidy and Firebug by Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.rmauger.co.uk/2010/01/keeping-your-html-valid-with-zend-framework-tidy-and-firebug/comment-page-1/#comment-969</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 07:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmauger.co.uk/?p=119#comment-969</guid>
		<description>Only just fount this, was there any update re HTML 5 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only just fount this, was there any update re HTML 5 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zend Framework, Zend_Dojo and  Dojo Tree by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.rmauger.co.uk/2009/02/zend-framework-zend_dojo-and-dojo-tree/comment-page-1/#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 20:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmauger.co.uk/?p=18#comment-966</guid>
		<description>Forget the last comment I was comparing the root level with next level branch[&#039;parents&#039;].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget the last comment I was comparing the root level with next level branch['parents'].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zend Framework, Zend_Dojo and  Dojo Tree by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.rmauger.co.uk/2009/02/zend-framework-zend_dojo-and-dojo-tree/comment-page-1/#comment-965</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 20:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmauger.co.uk/?p=18#comment-965</guid>
		<description>addendum to last post.  The $branch[&#039;parent&#039;] never seems to change so the conditional test always returns the branch[&#039;id&#039;].

Therefore, no indexed array.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>addendum to last post.  The $branch['parent'] never seems to change so the conditional test always returns the branch['id'].</p>
<p>Therefore, no indexed array.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zend Framework, Zend_Dojo and  Dojo Tree by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.rmauger.co.uk/2009/02/zend-framework-zend_dojo-and-dojo-tree/comment-page-1/#comment-964</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 19:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmauger.co.uk/?p=18#comment-964</guid>
		<description>I have been trying to use this and It seems to go into a black hole.  When I comment out this line:
$arrNodes[$key][&#039;children&#039;] = $this-&gt;_walkTree($branches, $this-&gt;thisPath);

it runs without adding any childern.  My arrays are below.

This is my top level:
  [&quot;admin&quot;] =&gt; array(4) {
    [&quot;parent&quot;] =&gt; string(1) &quot;0&quot;
    [&quot;id&quot;] =&gt; string(5) &quot;admin&quot;
    [&quot;branch_name&quot;] =&gt; string(28) &quot;mttdeveloper/refactor/action&quot;
    [&quot;label&quot;] =&gt; string(5) &quot;admin&quot;
  }
  [&quot;mttauthacl&quot;] =&gt; array(4) {
    [&quot;parent&quot;] =&gt; string(1) &quot;0&quot;
    [&quot;id&quot;] =&gt; string(10) &quot;mttauthacl&quot;
    [&quot;branch_name&quot;] =&gt; string(28) &quot;mttdeveloper/refactor/action&quot;
    [&quot;label&quot;] =&gt; string(10) &quot;mttauthacl&quot;
  }
  [&quot;mttdeveloper&quot;] =&gt; array(4) {
    [&quot;parent&quot;] =&gt; string(1) &quot;0&quot;
    [&quot;id&quot;] =&gt; string(12) &quot;mttdeveloper&quot;
    [&quot;branch_name&quot;] =&gt; string(28) &quot;mttdeveloper/refactor/action&quot;
    [&quot;label&quot;] =&gt; string(12) &quot;mttdeveloper&quot;
  }
}

Second Level looks like this:

  [&quot;admin&quot;] =&gt; array(4) {
    [&quot;parent&quot;] =&gt; string(5) &quot;admin&quot;
    [&quot;id&quot;] =&gt; string(5) &quot;admin&quot;
    [&quot;branch_name&quot;] =&gt; string(5) &quot;admin&quot;
    [&quot;label&quot;] =&gt; string(5) &quot;admin&quot;
  }
}

branches look like this with out their children.

array(2) {
  [&quot;admin&quot;] =&gt; array(5) {
    [&quot;id&quot;] =&gt; string(5) &quot;admin&quot;
    [&quot;label&quot;] =&gt; string(5) &quot;Admin&quot;
    [&quot;path&quot;] =&gt; string(30) &quot;/mttdeveloper/refactor/action/&quot;
    [&quot;iconClass&quot;] =&gt; string(6) &quot;folder&quot;
    [&quot;children&quot;] =&gt; array(0) {
    }
  }
  [&quot;demo&quot;] =&gt; array(5) {
    [&quot;id&quot;] =&gt; string(4) &quot;demo&quot;
    [&quot;label&quot;] =&gt; string(4) &quot;Demo&quot;
    [&quot;path&quot;] =&gt; string(30) &quot;/mttdeveloper/refactor/action/&quot;
    [&quot;iconClass&quot;] =&gt; string(6) &quot;folder&quot;
    [&quot;children&quot;] =&gt; array(0) {
    }
  }
}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been trying to use this and It seems to go into a black hole.  When I comment out this line:<br />
$arrNodes[$key]['children'] = $this-&gt;_walkTree($branches, $this-&gt;thisPath);</p>
<p>it runs without adding any childern.  My arrays are below.</p>
<p>This is my top level:<br />
  ["admin"] =&gt; array(4) {<br />
    ["parent"] =&gt; string(1) &#8220;0&#8243;<br />
    ["id"] =&gt; string(5) &#8220;admin&#8221;<br />
    ["branch_name"] =&gt; string(28) &#8220;mttdeveloper/refactor/action&#8221;<br />
    ["label"] =&gt; string(5) &#8220;admin&#8221;<br />
  }<br />
  ["mttauthacl"] =&gt; array(4) {<br />
    ["parent"] =&gt; string(1) &#8220;0&#8243;<br />
    ["id"] =&gt; string(10) &#8220;mttauthacl&#8221;<br />
    ["branch_name"] =&gt; string(28) &#8220;mttdeveloper/refactor/action&#8221;<br />
    ["label"] =&gt; string(10) &#8220;mttauthacl&#8221;<br />
  }<br />
  ["mttdeveloper"] =&gt; array(4) {<br />
    ["parent"] =&gt; string(1) &#8220;0&#8243;<br />
    ["id"] =&gt; string(12) &#8220;mttdeveloper&#8221;<br />
    ["branch_name"] =&gt; string(28) &#8220;mttdeveloper/refactor/action&#8221;<br />
    ["label"] =&gt; string(12) &#8220;mttdeveloper&#8221;<br />
  }<br />
}</p>
<p>Second Level looks like this:</p>
<p>  ["admin"] =&gt; array(4) {<br />
    ["parent"] =&gt; string(5) &#8220;admin&#8221;<br />
    ["id"] =&gt; string(5) &#8220;admin&#8221;<br />
    ["branch_name"] =&gt; string(5) &#8220;admin&#8221;<br />
    ["label"] =&gt; string(5) &#8220;admin&#8221;<br />
  }<br />
}</p>
<p>branches look like this with out their children.</p>
<p>array(2) {<br />
  ["admin"] =&gt; array(5) {<br />
    ["id"] =&gt; string(5) &#8220;admin&#8221;<br />
    ["label"] =&gt; string(5) &#8220;Admin&#8221;<br />
    ["path"] =&gt; string(30) &#8220;/mttdeveloper/refactor/action/&#8221;<br />
    ["iconClass"] =&gt; string(6) &#8220;folder&#8221;<br />
    ["children"] =&gt; array(0) {<br />
    }<br />
  }<br />
  ["demo"] =&gt; array(5) {<br />
    ["id"] =&gt; string(4) &#8220;demo&#8221;<br />
    ["label"] =&gt; string(4) &#8220;Demo&#8221;<br />
    ["path"] =&gt; string(30) &#8220;/mttdeveloper/refactor/action/&#8221;<br />
    ["iconClass"] =&gt; string(6) &#8220;folder&#8221;<br />
    ["children"] =&gt; array(0) {<br />
    }<br />
  }<br />
}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PHP BENELUX 2011 by Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.rmauger.co.uk/2011/02/php-benelux-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmauger.co.uk/?p=156#comment-956</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-889&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-889&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Martin de Keijzer&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;
          Great review, it’s good to see people enjoyed theirselves. Comments like these make organising a big event like this throughout the year worthwhile!
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I guess the main reason why they enjoyed themselves was that their host was very hospitable and considerate. Not many organizers are like that. I&#039;ve encountered a few not-so gracious hosts myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-889"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-889" rel="nofollow">Martin de Keijzer</a> :</strong><br />
          Great review, it’s good to see people enjoyed theirselves. Comments like these make organising a big event like this throughout the year worthwhile!
</p></blockquote>
<p>I guess the main reason why they enjoyed themselves was that their host was very hospitable and considerate. Not many organizers are like that. I&#8217;ve encountered a few not-so gracious hosts myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why the Zend Framework Actionstack is Evil by Judy</title>
		<link>http://www.rmauger.co.uk/2009/03/why-the-zend-framework-actionstack-is-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmauger.co.uk/?p=45#comment-955</guid>
		<description>Kieran said: &lt;blockquote&gt;Well said. When I started out with ZF I encountered the Actionstack, and a whole load of problems – many of which you touch on. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I couldn&#039;t agree more. I got a boatload of probs when I first started using Zend and the Actionstack. You touched on many of those issues. Just clarifies my thoughts on things.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kieran said:<br />
<blockquote>Well said. When I started out with ZF I encountered the Actionstack, and a whole load of problems – many of which you touch on. </p></blockquote>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more. I got a boatload of probs when I first started using Zend and the Actionstack. You touched on many of those issues. Just clarifies my thoughts on things&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why the Zend Framework Actionstack is Evil by Dimitri</title>
		<link>http://www.rmauger.co.uk/2009/03/why-the-zend-framework-actionstack-is-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-954</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 04:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmauger.co.uk/?p=45#comment-954</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-180&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-180&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Actionstack is not evil&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;
          Hello,
Actively developing with zf you can’t avoid hearing this over and over again, people compalining about the actionstack. I understand that you CAN make partials and views that render and fetch different stuff from the models. However, to create trully modular components, actionstack is a logical way to go (if actionstack really is such a bottleneck for performance maybe it should be made lighter). 
I have created an architecture which has dynamic modules that belong to some zone in a layout. The actionstack is used to make all the modules render themselves with their indexaction. For this reason I could just take that module and only use it solo because in indexaction it only echoes it’s own content. If you are using view scripts to also display actions of several modules in your page it is not really modular. I don’t know if you understand what I’m saying and I do get that actionstack gives overhead but it is still the thing that makes my modules the most logical I can have them. 
One thing though, I have never found the need for the action view helper and can’t really see a real use case for that one  
Cheers
         &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hello My Friend,
Can you tell me how did you do that?
How to echoes layouts-&gt;widgetized with the calling name of a nameAction?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-180"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-180" rel="nofollow">Actionstack is not evil</a> :</strong><br />
          Hello,<br />
Actively developing with zf you can’t avoid hearing this over and over again, people compalining about the actionstack. I understand that you CAN make partials and views that render and fetch different stuff from the models. However, to create trully modular components, actionstack is a logical way to go (if actionstack really is such a bottleneck for performance maybe it should be made lighter).<br />
I have created an architecture which has dynamic modules that belong to some zone in a layout. The actionstack is used to make all the modules render themselves with their indexaction. For this reason I could just take that module and only use it solo because in indexaction it only echoes it’s own content. If you are using view scripts to also display actions of several modules in your page it is not really modular. I don’t know if you understand what I’m saying and I do get that actionstack gives overhead but it is still the thing that makes my modules the most logical I can have them.<br />
One thing though, I have never found the need for the action view helper and can’t really see a real use case for that one<br />
Cheers
         </p></blockquote>
<p>Hello My Friend,<br />
Can you tell me how did you do that?<br />
How to echoes layouts-&gt;widgetized with the calling name of a nameAction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creating simple, extendible CRUD, using Zend Framework by aze</title>
		<link>http://www.rmauger.co.uk/2009/06/creating-simple-extendible-crud-using-zend-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-949</link>
		<dc:creator>aze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmauger.co.uk/?p=66#comment-949</guid>
		<description>aze</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aze</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

